Türkçe
English
In recent years, one new concept after another has entered the vocabulary of the health sector: wellbeing, longevity, youngevity, healthy aging, reset programs, functional medicine applications, biological age management, and personalized health journeys. Today many centers offer different schools of thought and approaches aimed at improving an individual’s quality of life, slowing age-related decline and extending healthy lifespan. Some propose transformation programs lasting a few weeks; others bring the individual into a follow-up model that will run for years.
But perhaps the fundamental question we should be asking is this: is all of this really enough to deliver well-being?
With the Well-Being Services Regulation published in Turkey on July 4, 2026, the concept of “well-being” officially entered the terminology of our health system for the first time. This regulation is not merely a technical text governing the opening of new centers in hotels, hospitals and clinics; it is a symbolic indicator of the major transformation in our understanding of health. Because the goal is no longer just to treat disease, but to protect and enhance a person’s state of well-being. Right now, in our country and in many places around the world, such programs are being prepared or implemented with different content to “reset” individuals.
In fact, the world has been chasing this question for a long time. Today the size of the global well-being economy has reached trillions of dollars. Among the world’s largest well-being markets are the United States, China and Japan. According to a report by the Global Wellness Institute, countries are now investing not only in health systems, but in holistic life models that enable people to live well.
Because well-being is not just a check-up result. Well-being is about sleep quality, stress management, sense of meaning, social bonds, movement capacity, productivity, mental resilience and life purpose.
For this reason, we now speak of three different layers of well-being.
The first is individual well-being. Longevity centers, functional medicine applications, genetic and epigenetic screenings, and personalized nutrition programs built on biomarker analyses, together with preventive health approaches, help an individual stay strong for longer. But a lower biological age does not by itself mean well-being. A person is not simply a biological machine made up of organs.
The state of well-being that emerges when individuals, through a biohacking system, also add new social and physical habits to their lives will raise their quality of life, the benefit they provide to those around them, and their productivity, making life more meaningful.
The second layer is corporate well-being.
Today, the world’s most successful companies see employee happiness not as a human resources project, but as a competitive advantage. Psychological support programs, leadership development models, flexible working systems, movement programs and employee support projects now sit at the center of corporate strategies. Because it is not possible to generate sustainable success with burnt-out employees.
We now come across some new job titles within human resources structures: Chief Happiness Officer (CHO), Employee Experience, People & Culture, Well-being Office, Employee Success, Culture & Engagement, and People & Happiness are some of the ones I have encountered.
Some global companies such as Google, SAP, Airbnb, Unilever, Microsoft, Amazon and Allianz have created positions directly titled Chief Happiness Officer or Chief Wellbeing Officer. The purpose of these roles is to ensure employees have not only a productive, but also a healthy, engaged and meaningful work experience. The reason for this shift is quite simple:
In the past, companies bought employees’ time. Today they have to earn their energy, creativity, attention and commitment.
But there is also an important risk here: “well-being washing.” A yoga session, a fruit day or a few motivational talks are not enough to create employee well-being. Genuine corporate well-being is built through workload, leadership culture, an environment of trust, belonging and a sense of meaning. Institutions that fail to manage their employees’ well-being are, sooner or later, choosing a path on which they will have to bear the cost of burnout.
The third and perhaps the most important layer is national well-being.
Today, some countries no longer measure success only by per capita income or growth rates. Happiness, health, environmental sustainability, social bonds and quality of life are now considered just as important as economic performance. This approach is called the “wellbeing economy.” Countries such as New Zealand, Finland, Iceland and Scotland are shaping their public policies with this understanding. Even the World Health Organization now defines well-being as a shared goal not only of the health sector, but of all public policy.
Perhaps humanity’s greatest question over the next twenty years will be how we can remain strong, independent, productive and meaningful while living longer. Because humanity’s new goal is not to extend lifespan, but to deepen life. And perhaps this is the truest definition of well-being:
Not to feel good, but to be able to stay well.
Not to live long, but to be able to live well.
Because life really is not just about living, but about living well.
So when I read the well-being regulation last week, I thought this expression needed to be planned for across many layers: Individual well-being → Corporate well-being → Societal well-being → National well-being
Because the competitive advantage of the future will not be about owning technology alone, but about being able to build healthier, more productive, more resilient and happier human communities.
The health system now maturing in our lives will try to understand not diseases, but people. And the journey of well-being will begin exactly here. To give this concept real substance, we now need to take individual responsibility and also undergo a shift in societal approach.
“Nosce te ipsum.” — Know thyself.
